Opposite of What I'd Expect
Each year this comes out, based on two year old tax information recently released.
As they say in the Technical Notes, "philanthropic generosity is not just how much one gives, but how much one gives in relation to how much one has-the so-called "widow's mite" phenomenon. As we have said from the outset, the Generosity Index is a "crude but telling" indicator; it is not scientific (e.g., economics, sociology) but it is educational, and specifically for donor education. It tells people roughly where they stand in comparison with their peers in other communities, in the relation between their respective ranks in income and in charitable giving. By doing so it raises the level of public discussions of charitable giving, in ways that are strategically useful."
What surprises and stuns me is that the red states are much more charitable and giving than the blue ones in the Northeast. I have no explanation, only misery. That Mississippi, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Alambama are the most generous while Connecticut, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island are the worst goes against everything I've believed.
Damn.
RussNews on 11.10.04 @ 02:03 PM PDT [link]